"THE MUSIC OF THE
SPHERES"
A Sermon by the
Rev. Dr. Bruce Clear
Sunday, April 6,
2003
All Souls
Unitarian Church
Indianapolis,
Indiana
It is hard to imagine life without music. Music has become so much a part of
our lives that it seems to be an integral part of nature and of human
experience. In fact, in some ways it is. In a book on the relationship between
art and physics, Leonard Schlain has this to say about the role of music:
"While
art and physics are solely human expressions, music is a common medium for many
living forms. Song is the language of birds and whales. Lions, tigers and other
animals are soothed by tranquil melodies. It has even been proposed that plants
respond to music. The ability of species to generate and respond to music is
one of the great unexplained mysteries of nature."
This
morning I wish to focus on the place of music as a natural part of life. I do
so because this is a special day -- a special musical day. This afternoon our
choir will present its Spring concert, this year in honor of our church's
centennial celebration, as well as marking the 51st anniversary of
the creation of our choir. I hope everyone here will be able come to the
concert at 4:00 p.m.
I take as
the title the phrase, "Music of the Spheres," for it seems to me that
points to the universal appeal of music.
The
phrase "music of the spheres" is actually quite old. It was inspired
by the awe people felt in observing the movement in the heavens above. It
refers, of course, to the complex and intricate motion of the planets and
stars, and what seems like harmony emanating from them. The idea that the stars
and planets danced to music is even much older than the use of this phrase.
Pythagoras, the ancient mathematician whose theorem we memorized in junior
high, and most of us forgot upon graduation, made much of the metaphor between
music and the stars. Pythagoras, who lived in the sixth century B.C., believed
that everything could be reduced to numbers. He was the first to reduce music
to numerical notation, and tried to do the same with the path of the stars and
planets. What music shared with the spheres of the heavens, according to what
he discovered, was this beautiful sense of mathematical harmony. He even
speculated that the planets, as they would spin through space, made harmonious
musical sounds. That music can actually be heard, he said, but since we are
exposed to it from the moment of our birth, we unable to distinguish it from
other sounds.
Plato
shared some of Pythagoras' musical metaphors for the heavens, and wrote in his
cosmology of the songs of the planets that harmonized together.
You can
go back even further to find this metaphor. A thousand years before Plato and
Pythagoras, the Hebrew book of Job mentions the beginnings of time when, it
says, "The morning stars sang together."
In
English, the actual phrase "Music of the Spheres" comes from a long
poem by Sir John Davies, written nearly 400 years ago -- before space ships,
before telescopes, before planes or trains. Not only before Bernstein, but even
before Beethoven. The poem, called "Orchestra," looks to the stars as
a vast musical harmony, twirling in concert, like a symphony. The line from
which the phrase comes is this:
"Forward
and backward
rapt and
whirled are
According
to the music
of the
spheres."
The
phrase seems to have struck a chord, so to speak, and it has been used over and
over. The harmony that is seen in the celestial drama does strike us like a
well-orchestrated piece of music. William Shakespeare, a contemporary of
Davies, used the line as well in his play Twelfth Night. In the next century,
Sir Thomas Browne elaborated on the metaphor in a theological treatise when he
wrote:
"There
is music wherever there is harmony, order, or proportion; and thus far we may maintain the music of the
spheres."
There
is something calming about the bringing order together out of seeming chaos. In
the realm of matter it is astounding to consider that billions of years of
evolution of what started out as somewhat random combinations of cosmic dust
became so astoundingly ordered that the world of matter produced something as
beautiful as flower, as majestic as a soaring eagle, or as calming as the ocean
surf. Evolution brought all the disparate pieces of chaotic matter together
into a soothing order that seems to exist for our enjoyment.
Whatever
it is that drives evolution seems inclined to shape the chaotic universe into
some kind of sensible order: a balance, a symmetry, a harmony. And so it is
also with sound. What could easily have been a chaos of sound is seemingly
shaped by all animals in nature into an ordered sense of beauty. There is music
in the cosmic sphere of things.
This
metaphor makes a lot of sense, and perhaps that is why it has survived over
these thousands of years. There is something about the cosmic sky that strikes
us as harmonious.
Our lives
these days feel so much the chaos of crisis. Our fears are inspired by events
outside of our control. One of the comforting qualities of music is that it
provides a piece of nature over which we can muster some control. In these
times of war and crisis, perhaps more than any other time, we should welcome
the reassuring balm that music supplies.
I
remember that when, as a child, I was first introduced to the idea of cosmic
design, it was presented as if it were some kind of complex mechanical
contraption. It may have been in eighth-grade science class that the teacher
pulled out a funny-looking model of the sun and planets, with wires and
styrofoam balls that would swing around each other, resembling, it seemed, a
Rube Goldberg universe. This mechanical devise made sense, and was quite useful
in explaining the way the universe works. But now I know there is more to it
than that. It is more than a complex mechanical device -- it is also a cosmic
piece of art. The spheres are, in the word used by Davies, an
"orchestra."
It was
probably also in the eighth grade, or thereabout, that I first heard of Pythagoras
in a geometry class. If I had learned then what Pythagoras said about the stars
and planets, that the paths they traveled followed a great harmony, that the
heavens danced as if following great music, it might have helped me in science
class as I contemplated the cosmic contraption the teacher demonstrated for us.
Come to think of it, if I had known that Pythagoras thought of numbers as an
_expression of music, it might have helped me in geometry class as well.
It is
said that the early study of astronomy posed a threat to religion. And as
religion was taught then, I
suppose it did. Religion taught in ancient days that the earth is somehow
central to all creation, and that we, the people, are the central focus of the
universe. But as astronomers discovered more and more how minor the earth
really is in the great scheme of the universe, it undermined the theology which
made the earth into God's favorite planet, and our species into God's favorite
beings. We are, we discovered, a tiny little piece of the whole, easily
overlooked if someone were to study the whole universe -- a speck of sand on a
vast seacoast of planets and stars. It is no wonder that astronomy was a threat
to what religion taught.
But in
another sense, astronomy served to strengthen a different kind of religious
view. There is no threat to religion when we re-think religion to fit our
expanding knowledge of the world. What astronomy revealed, in demonstrating the
complex harmony of the universe, is how the universe of which we are a part is
more than just a Rube Goldberg contraption, a machine with styrofoam balls
spinning around each other. The universe is, in fact, a symphony of beauty. We
earth-based homo sapiens may
not be the be-all and end-all of creation that religion once mistakenly taught,
but we are part of something vast and beautiful that is far greater, far more
inspiring than anything any religion could ever conceive without the
contribution of science.
It is, as
T.S. Eliot wrote, a kind of "Music heard so deeply that it is not heard at
all." And then Eliot adds: "You are the music, while the music
lasts." To understand the cosmos of which we are a part as a great, even
the ultimate, symphony, is no threat at all to a mature religious sense, the
sense that seeks out beauty, truth, and goodness in the music of the spheres.
As Albert Einstein once said, "The most important function of art and science is to awaken the cosmic
religious feeling and keep it alive."
But I
would like to leave the heavens behind for the next few minutes, and come down
to earth, somewhat literally.
There is
a new consciousness about the earth and about nature, about which we Unitarian
Universalists tend to share much enthusiasm. There is a new consciousness of nature among us. It is growing
and re-making our image of ourselves and of our planet, earth.
The
phrase that is often used to identify this new awareness is "ecological
consciousness," that is, a conscious awareness of the limits and
interdependence of nature. "Ecology" is in fact a relatively new
concern in the popular mind. Ecology, we know, has to do with understanding the
harmony within nature -- its diversity, its interdependence, and its
limitations.
Patrick
Moore, a Canadian ecologist (and one of the founders of the Greenpeace movement)
has described what he calls the "three laws of ecology:"
The First Law of Ecology... states that all forms of life
are interdependent. The prey is as dependent on the predator for the control of
its population as the predator is on the prey for supply of food.
The Second Law of Ecology... states that the stability
(unity, security, harmony, togetherness) of ecosystems is dependent on their
diversity (complexity). An ecosystem that contains 100 different species is
more stable than a system that has only three species.
The Third Law of Ecology... states that all resources (food,
water, air, minerals, energy) are finite and there are limits to growth of all
living systems. These limits are finally dictated by the finite size of the
earth and the finite input of energy from the sun.
Just
as we can look at the stars and planets as something more than just a
mechanical contraption -- we can see in them an _expression of art, a harmony
of motion -- so also we can view this earth as a similar work of art. What has
been said about the harmony of the heavens (or "the music of the
spheres") also applies here on earth.
That all
parts are interdependent is as much a musical and artistic truth as it is a
scientific one. The music of the spheres that guides the interdependent
galaxies also resounds here. To tamper with the parts, to destroy the pieces of
the earth's symphony, to use up the resources that contribute to the beauty of
terrestrial music, is to cause discordant notes to the human experience as well
as to the earth.
We have a
very direct dependence on the earth -- and her resources are quickly being used
up. While much could be said about how our lives will be diminished because of
the over-use of such resources, this morning I would rather focus on how such
overuse disturbs the harmony of the whole and affects the human artistic sense.
When
voices arise around us to pay attention to, and respect for, the ecology of
nature, the phrase that is sometimes used is that we need to "listen to
the earth." Listen to the earth! The implication of that phrase is simply
that the earth is telling us something, that it expresses itself to us, and
that we need to listen. If ecology means listening to the earth, then I imagine
that what is heard, or what we hope to hear, is musical -- harmonious and
melodic. A Jewish prayer of thanksgiving to God says it this way:
"You have made us able to hear the music of the
world.... A divine voice sings through all creation."
It has
become the task of our era to learn to listen to the music of the world, to
tune our ears to the earth and hear its cries as well as its celebrations. It
is our task to understand nature not just as a mechanical device, but as an
artistic _expression.
There is
a literal as well as figurative direction to my sermon this morning. We began
in the vast outer space of the universe, acknowledging the harmony that is
imbedded in its form, noting how much it resembles a complex piece of music. In
a second movement, we turned attention to the earth itself, the complexity of
the ecosystem, and how it interplays with harmony and discord, and how its
balance can be respected as we respect the interplay of sounds in great music.
I now
hope to bring us even closer to home, and examine, as if the third movement in
this morning's sermon, how this metaphor of music may help in understanding our
human lives as well.
It is
said that civilization exists only when art exists. Whitehead said it this way:
"Art heightens the sense of
humanity. It gives an elation of feeling which is supernatural. A sunset is
glorious, but it dwarfs humanity and belongs to the general flow of nature. A
million sunsets will not spur us toward civilization. (Rather), it requires Art
to evoke into consciousness the finite perfections which lie ready for human
achievement. Thus, in its broadest sense, art is civilization. For civilization
is nothing other than the unremitting aim at the major perfections of
harmony."
In
other words, civilization happens whenever we human beings attempt to create
(or re-create, express through human medium), the very art and music we
experience from nature itself.
I suspect
that not all of you have been wholly on board with my metaphor this morning.
For some of you, it may have felt like stretching it a bit to think of the
stars and planets as moving in harmony as music moves in harmony. For some of
you, it may have felt just a little too contrived to consider the earth's
ecology as comparable to the flow, balance, and complexity of music. But I hope
that most of you can at least join with me on this one simple observation: successful
living is more of an art than a technology. Regardless of how many thousands of
"self-help" books that are published, there is no reliable or
fail-safe "how-to" instruction manual that can guarantee we can
become a perfect parent or partner, or a person of profound worth, or that we
will live a meaningful life. It is something we must, ourselves, create and
compose -- just as an artist creates a work of beauty, or a composer creates a
piece of music.
The
harmony of the cosmos, or of the earth's natural system, is an inherent
quality, a natural trait. The harmony of any given human life does not happen
naturally, it must be designed and composed. It is the many life experiences
each of us has that provide the resources for composing such a life.
Every
experience we have, great or small, joyful or tragic, can be used to enhance
the life we compose. When a child is born, the lives around that child -- from
parents and siblings to family friends and neighbors -- are affected and
rearranged in large or small ways into different form. Those of us who have had
responsibility to care for a child know that the greatest lesson is what we
come to learn about ourselves-- and those lessons become resources for further
composing our lives.
In some
ways, the broader and deeper our experiences, the more resources we have to use
to make harmony in our lives. Every book we read, every friend we make, every
meaningful conversation supplies us with something more to use in the art of
living. Each of us can find examples of experiences that, at the time had
little importance, but in hindsight the experience became a huge influence on
our lives. When I was about twenty, I attended a wedding at a Unitarian church;
little did I know when I picked up the literature from the table that I would
use that experience to change my life forever.
Every
life experience provides lessons and resources through which we can use to
shape and craft the direction of our lives. We do compose our own lives as a
composer does a piece of music. I said in the first section, concerning the
music of the universe, that astronomy at first threatened religion because it
threatened the view that we are the most important component of the universe.
But astronomy threatened religion only because religion, for far too long,
clung on to a misguided idea about how the universe works. In truth, astronomy
opened religion up to a much grander view by showing us how beauty and harmony
are qualities of everything. What is true for the life of the universe is also
true for us.
The
Catholic theologian Arturo Paoli saw this as an ethical imperative as well. He
wrote:
"To be religious is to give your life
so that the world may be more beautiful, more just, more at peace; it is to
prevent egotistical and self-serving ends from disrupting this harmony of the
whole."
In Love's Labour's Lost, Shakespeare said it
this way: "And when Love speaks, the voice of all the gods makes heaven
drowsy with the harmony."
Religion,
at its best, supplies a life that allows us to see the beauty and harmony that
is there if only we look closely enough. Through the ages, the great minds have
seen it in the spheres -- the dance of stars and planets. Some are discovering
it in the ecological awareness of nature's interdependence. Perhaps we, people
of religion, attempt not only to see it, but to create in the art of living.
The
musical art of life has been identified by many thoughtful people over the
centuries. One of those was William Ellery Channing, who, over 150 years ago,
gave rise to the Unitarian movement in this country. In one passage which has
become quite popular, Channing also speaks how we create our own life like a
work of art, and ends with an acknowledgment of music as a metaphor for life --
he says of good life values that they are a symphony. I'll close with his
summery comment of that symphony:
"To live content with small means, to seek elegance
rather than luxury, and refinement rather than fashion, to be worthy, not
respectable, wealthy, not rich, to study hard, think quietly, talk gently, act
frankly, to listen to stars and birds, babes and sages, with open heart, to
bear all cheerfully, do all bravely, await occasions, hurry never -- in a word,
to let the spiritual, unbidden and unconscious grow up through the common. This
is to be my symphony. "